"Of those who would be receptive to anti-Christian messaging, you’ll typically either find liberals who reject the other “blood and soil” part of your message or antisocial misanthropes who are motivated primarily by hatred of society and not by a love for their people – not the sort of people you want representing our message."
This point is especially salient. In society, who are the anti-Christians? They're almost all left wing. The ones who care enough about opposing Christianity are the cliche "blue haired feminist" types that the right claims to oppose the most.
Thank you! Yes, the average person that we’d want on our side would be revolted by some of the comments made by these people - we have a hard enough time as it is to accept race realism!
Your stated answer: “It’s to attack the ideas within the modern conception of it that have resulted in the world that we see today – ideas which are obviously false and destructive…”
This is what we must do to reframe any system that has been polluted by overly liberalized modernity. Nearly all problems we face are due to a modernized perversion, a subversion, of people’s perception, conception, or teachings of any given sociological structure. We cannot waste time attempting to break centuries old social norms that are rooted deep in our blood. The pursuit of the individual to reclaim, revive, and restore those systems, so that they and their immediate sphere may experience reality expressed through truth, is undoubtedly a more righteous path.
A very solid point! People have to take into account our ingrained sensibilities and attempt to frame the ideas in a palatable way. Freedom is a big one for people. They see it on a spectrum of “government control” in our personal lives and neglect to think about national sovereignty or “freedom.” National Socialism, while authoritarian in function, provides freedom from foreign interference and foreign people committing heinous violence against us on the street - both of which are obviously more important than your personal freedoms, as they will be lost regardless, if the latter issues are not dealt with.
Eloquently put, Charles.
"Of those who would be receptive to anti-Christian messaging, you’ll typically either find liberals who reject the other “blood and soil” part of your message or antisocial misanthropes who are motivated primarily by hatred of society and not by a love for their people – not the sort of people you want representing our message."
This point is especially salient. In society, who are the anti-Christians? They're almost all left wing. The ones who care enough about opposing Christianity are the cliche "blue haired feminist" types that the right claims to oppose the most.
Thank you! Yes, the average person that we’d want on our side would be revolted by some of the comments made by these people - we have a hard enough time as it is to accept race realism!
Amazing article man, I subscribed to substack yesterday cuz I saw it in Floods channel
Thank you! Yeah, I was surprised and grateful to see that Flood had picked it up and read it during his morning stream.
Your stated answer: “It’s to attack the ideas within the modern conception of it that have resulted in the world that we see today – ideas which are obviously false and destructive…”
This is what we must do to reframe any system that has been polluted by overly liberalized modernity. Nearly all problems we face are due to a modernized perversion, a subversion, of people’s perception, conception, or teachings of any given sociological structure. We cannot waste time attempting to break centuries old social norms that are rooted deep in our blood. The pursuit of the individual to reclaim, revive, and restore those systems, so that they and their immediate sphere may experience reality expressed through truth, is undoubtedly a more righteous path.
A very solid point! People have to take into account our ingrained sensibilities and attempt to frame the ideas in a palatable way. Freedom is a big one for people. They see it on a spectrum of “government control” in our personal lives and neglect to think about national sovereignty or “freedom.” National Socialism, while authoritarian in function, provides freedom from foreign interference and foreign people committing heinous violence against us on the street - both of which are obviously more important than your personal freedoms, as they will be lost regardless, if the latter issues are not dealt with.